Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative analysis examines barriers faced by disabled engineering students, suggesting improvements for institutional practices.
Disabled people remain marginalised within engineering higher education and the engineering workforce. The present study draws on interviews with ten disabled undergraduate engineering students to examine their lived experiences and the institutional conditions that shaped them. Interview transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Findings show that barriers extended beyond unmet accommodations and included cumulative impacts on academic progress, health, and belonging, alongside repeated demands for disclosure and self-advocacy. These impacts compounded over time and shaped students’ educational trajectories, including decisions about whether to remain in engineering. We conclude with actionable implications for teaching and institutional practice aimed at embedding access more consistently across engineering programmes and higher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Figard et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: