Scoping review identifies gaps in ultrasound protocols for austere and combat environments, suggesting standardized training is necessary.
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) enhances combat survivability, yet civilian standards often fail to address battlefield constraints. This scoping review delineates Expeditionary POCUS (E-POCUS) as a distinct capability. METHODS: A systematic scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar through November 2025. Inclusion criteria targeted terrestrial austere and combat environments, strictly excluding hospital-based studies. We assessed quality using a modified GRADE framework. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Data originated largely from civilian, resource-limited settings (34%) rather than from military zones (26%). Methodological quality was polarized: high-quality randomized trials supported artificial intelligence-assisted acquisition, while trauma protocols relied on very low-quality animal models. Analysis identified critical gaps in military-relevant POCUS standardization in equipment acquisition, training, and the application of ultrasound in austere and combat environments. CONCLUSION: E-POCUS requires a doctrine distinct from civilian standards. We propose a Best, Better, Minimum competency matrix to standardize training and justify the allocation of ultrasound equipment. We argue that to ensure the sustainability of standardized training in E-POCUS as a diagnostic capability, future research must validate these frameworks along with systemic quality improvement initiatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stevens et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: