Compares rainfall predictions in Tokyo using numerical and advection models, suggesting NWP outperforms advection for rapid updates.
Precipitation nowcasting consists of high-resolution forecasting of rainfall at very-short lead times and is crucial for assessing the imminent risk from heavy rainfall, often from fast-evolving convective weather systems that can develop rapidly within minutes. Common approaches to precipitation nowcasting include the use of a convection-resolving numerical weather prediction (NWP) model or advection-based model, the latter of which rely on temporal extrapolations of rainfall based upon flow vector calculations from quantitative precipitation estimation images. With the development of the Multi-Parameter Phased Array Weather Radar (MP-PAWR) providing high-resolution observations every 30-seconds, the potential to refresh these models at frequencies high enough to capture the rapid evolution of convective weather systems is possible. In this study we compare nowcasting skill using a regional-scale NWP model and an advection model that both employ a 30-second update using MP-PAWR observations for a single convective event that brought heavy rainfall to Tokyo in 2021. Based on a skill evaluation of 120 forecasts, this study highlights the advantage of the NWP system over the advection-based model to better predict rainfall from 2 to 30 min, led by its ability to predict rapid physical changes to the convective system over this timeframe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: