Key result
HIIT shows no benefit over MICT for improving cardiorespiratory fitness in obese adults.
Why the study?
The comparative effectiveness of moderate-intensity continuous training and high-intensity interval training for improving cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity in obese individuals remains inconclusive.
Does High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) improve cardiorespiratory fitness and reduce body fat percentage compared to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) in obese adults?
Meta-Analysis
Does High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) improve cardiorespiratory fitness and reduce body fat percentage compared to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) in obese adults?
Both HIIT and MICT provide equivalent improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness and body fat percentage among obese adults, suggesting exercise prescriptions can be tailored to individual preferences.
HIIT and MICT yield comparable cardiorespiratory fitness gains in obesity; supports individualized prescriptions and resolves prior inconclusive comparisons.
Exercise, as a non-pharmacological strategy, has demonstrated positive effects in managing cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity among obese individuals. However, the comparative effectiveness of Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) and High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) remains inconclusive. This study aimed to identify the most efficient exercise intensity for improving cardiorespiratory fitness and reducing body fat percentage in obese individuals. This review only included subjects who had a mean BMI of ≥30 kg/m2, percentage body fat >30kg, aged between 18 and 60 years old and only consisted of intervention of exercises alone without caloric restriction. The study employed HIIT intervention at 85% Heart Rate Reserves (HRR) and MICT at 60% HRRA systematic search of electronic databases was conducted from 1970 to October 2022, yielding twenty eligible studies. The PRISMA flowchart guided study selection, meanwhile the quality of included studies was assessed using TESTEX criteria. The results of the study indicated no significant difference between HIIT and MICT in improving cardiorespiratory fitness (WMD = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.53; P = 0.04; I²: 25%) or percentage body fat (WMD: 0.23; 95% CI: -0.53 to 0.07; P = 0.13; I²: 67%) among obese adults. Despite small changes, both exercise modalities demonstrated improvements. Therefore, health practitioners are encouraged to prescribe exercises tailored to individual preferences, as HIIT and MICT provide equivalent effects. This study contributes to the understanding of exercise interventions for managing obesity-related health outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahzan et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Obesity. High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) at 60% HRR was evaluated on Cardiorespiratory fitness (WMD 0.27, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.53, p=0.04). High-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training showed no significant difference in improving cardiorespiratory fitness (WMD 0.27) among obese adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: