Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates endothelial function in kidney transplant recipients, suggesting CNIs have no significant clinical impact on dysfunction.
Introduction Side effects of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) comprise hypertension, diabetes and nephrotoxicity, and endothelial dysfunction (ED) has often been implicated. Belatacept, a co-stimulation blocker, may offer a more favourable vascular profile. Methods We investigated markers of endothelial function in blood samples from kidney transplant recipients (KTR) that were converted from CNI to belatacept. We assessed established markers of ED including soluble thrombomodulin, P-selectin and angiopoietin 1 and 2. In addition, we assessed expression levels of microRNAs (miRNAs), which have been identified as discriminative markers for ED, rejection and renal fibrosis in the setting of transplantation. Lastly, we used patient samples and CNI-dilution series in a validated model of ED in which changes in morphological characteristics of endothelial cells were evaluated. Results Unexpectedly, we found no differences in our assays between both groups. We did observe dose-related effects of CNI on endothelial cell (EC) morphology upon direct exposure of EC to tacrolimus and ciclosporin A, but a similar effect was not seen when plasma samples of KTR who were converted to belatacept were compared with samples from KTR on CNI's. Discussion These data suggest that CNI-side-effects bundled under the term “CNI-toxicity” are not derived from a significant clinical effect of CNI on endothelial function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bredewold et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: