Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates adjuvant therapy impact on survival in stage II melanoma, suggesting tailored approaches based on T-stage and margins.
AIMS: Patients with stage II melanoma have multiple adjuvant therapy options in national guidelines. We evaluated management strategies to better define treatment in this heterogeneous population. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (2010-2021), we identified patients with pathological stage IIA-IIC cutaneous melanoma who underwent surgical resection. Adjuvant treatment categories included no additional therapy (i.e. surgery only), immunotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy plus radiation. Multivariable Cox proportional models evaluated overall survival by T-stage groups: T2b/T3a, T3b/T4a, and T4b and margin status (negative vs. positive). With negative margins, adjuvant therapy did not improve survival in T2b/T3a patients. Adjuvant immunotherapy in the negative margin cohort improved survival in T3b/T4a (HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.44-0.62) and T4b (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.47-0.62) melanoma. Among patients with positive margins, no benefit was observed with adjuvant therapy of any modality among all T-stage group cohorts. CONCLUSION: The impact of adjuvant treatment on overall survival in stage II melanoma depended on T-stage and margin status. Patients with low-risk disease had no survival benefit, while those with high-risk melanoma, T3b/T4a and T4b, benefited from adjuvant immunotherapy after R0 resection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morocho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: