Case report demonstrates diagnostic difficulties and treatment responses in a young woman with endometrial PNET, highlighting the need for careful evaluation.
Haoyun Zhao,* Lu Yang,* Ya Shi, Lindong Yang, Weiqi Jiang Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, Peopleâs Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Weiqi Jiang, Email hebaodanhuaer@163.com Lindong Yang, Email yanglingdong-123@163.comBackground: Primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) is a rare and aggressive malignancy, with primary occurrence in the endometrium being uncommon. Due to nonspecific clinical and imaging features, it is frequently misdiagnosed, leading to delayed treatment and poor prognosis.Case Presentation: We present the case of a 26-year-old woman with persistent abnormal uterine bleeding, initially misdiagnosed as benign endometrial polyp following curettage. Subsequent imaging revealed a large intrauterine mass, and definitive diagnosis of primary endometrium PNET was established through histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses, including characteristic CD99 positivity and HomerâWright rosettes. The patient underwent modified radical hysterectomy with lymph node dissection, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, which was discontinued due to severe toxicity.Conclusion: This report provides further elucidation on the diagnostic challenges inherent to primary endometrium PNET, underscoring the contribution of immunohistochemical analysis in resolving differential diagnoses among small round cell tumors. Rare neoplasms should warrant consideration in young patients presenting with atypical uterine hemorrhage, particularly in scenarios where preliminary pathological findings are inconclusive. The establishment of an early and definitive diagnosis, coupled with the implementation of a multimodal treatment strategy, is fundamental to optimizing clinical outcomes for this aggressive condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: