Assesses hemocompatibility of fibrin/heparin-coated and PMEA-coated flow diverters, indicating better outcomes with one coating.
Flow diverters play an important role in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms; however, their use can be associated with thromboembolic complications. Thus, in recent years, flow diverters with surface coatings have been developed to prevent thrombus-related complications. In this study, the hemocompatibility of the flow diverters FRED X with poly(2-methoxyethyl acrylate) (PMEA) coating and the DERIVO 2heal with fibrin/heparin coating, as well as the uncoated DERIVO 2 flow diverter, was evaluated using an in vitro blood circulation model. Using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), biomarkers of thrombocytes (β-thromboglobulin (β-TG)), coagulation (thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT)), complement system (SC5b-9), and inflammation (PMN elastase) activation were analyzed. Further analyses comprised thrombogenicity assessment by scanning electron microscopy and measurement of blood cell counts and hemolysis. The uncoated DERIVO 2 flow diverter exhibited increased coagulation and platelet activation, accompanied by enhanced adhesion of platelets to the blood-contacting surfaces. In contrast, both the FRED X and the DERIVO 2-heal flow diverter could effectively reduce the coagulation (TAT) and platelet activation (β-TG) and prevent the adhesion of platelets. Notably, DERIVO 2heal flow diverter induced significantly lower activation of the complement system (SC5b-9) and reduced inflammatory response (PMN elastase) compared to FRED X flow diverter. These findings indicate the improved hemocompatibility of the fibrin/heparin-coated DERIVO 2heal flow diverter and its potential to reduce thromboinflammatory complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: