Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates structural response of gas pipelines under localized subsidence, indicating model robustness for predicting failures.
This article investigates the vulnerability of buried steel gas pipelines subjected to Gaussian-shaped localized subsidence in cohesionless sands (c = 0). The study aims to assess both (i) the transmission of free-field ground curvature to the pipeline and (ii) the resulting structural responses. In this context, a comprehensive parametric investigation involving 1080 three-dimensional finite element simulations is conducted using PLAXIS 3D, covering wide ranges of sand stiffness and strength parameters, pipeline geometries, burial conditions, and subsidence-profile characteristics. A surrogate model (named meta-model) is developed to predict curvature transmission using a dimensionless relative stiffness coefficient R*. The regression formulation achieves a high coefficient of determination (R² = 0.9884) with a low residual standard deviation (σ = 0.0211). Validation against centrifuge and full-scale experimental datasets from literature supports the robustness of the model, while comparisons with existing meta-models from the literature position the present 3D-based formulation with respect to earlier simplified approaches. Three additional meta-models are developed to predict: (i) the peak axial stress, (ii) the maximum shear stress, and (iii) the cross-sectional ovalisation. These models show strong agreement with numerical results (R² > 0.88, mean relative error below 14%), enabling rapid predictions without further finite element analyses. Finally, a probabilistic application demonstrates how the framework can be embedded within a reliability-based approach, supporting the assessment of structural integrity and the prevention of failure in buried pipelines under Gaussian-shaped localized subsidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joundi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: