Evaluates auditor hypothesis plausibility in analytical reviews, suggesting experience influences error cause distinction.
Evaluates the plausibility of an auditor's hypotheses in an analytical review setting. Influence of experience on the auditor's ability to distinguish between high- and low-frequency error causes; Ability to distinguish between error causes and non-error causes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaplan et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: