This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Alessandro Ingusci’s Relational Dynamic Ontology of Tension — Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time V4.2 (TIT) (2026), in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Ingusci’s model of emergent physical time as a result of informational tension, friction, and dissipation among relational states, formally articulated through Jensen–Shannon divergence, Fisher–Rao geometry, and the variational principle of Tensostasis. The analysis argues that TIT establishes a significant field of dialogue with TO because both frameworks reject the absolute fundamentality of physical time and emphasize relation, boundary, tension, informational emergence, and structural convergence. Particular attention is given to the compatibility between TIT and the modal axioms of TO, especially boundary, recursive composition, and the transcendent element understood in TO as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. At the same time, the article identifies important points of tension. TIT begins from already constituted informational states, whereas TO requires a modal-cosmogonic deduction from the logical spherical Nothing. TIT also formalizes mainly the reductive movement of tension toward equilibrium, while TO requires the joint articulation of expansive and reductive Inducer Effects. Therefore, the article proposes that TIT should not be read as a substitute for the cosmogonic theorem of TO, but as a potentially useful auxiliary model for operationalizing temporalization through informational tension in already differentiated systems. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Alessandro Ingusci; Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time; TIT V4.2; Tensostasis; emergent time; informational friction; Jensen–Shannon divergence; Fisher–Rao geometry; modal ontology; logical spherical Nothing; Inducer Effects; atomic radiation; transcendent substance; cosmology; philosophy of physics.
Cabannas et al. (Sat,) studied this question.