This study qualitatively evaluated the socio-economic and environmental effects of the Enugu Urban municipal dumpsite on surrounding residents, businesses, commuters, and drivers. The study was motivated by growing concerns regarding the environmental sustainability of waste disposal practices and their implications for public health, neighbourhood quality, and economic activities in Enugu metropolis. A qualitative research design was adopted, with primary data collected through semi-structured interviews and direct field observations. Thirty respondents comprising residents, business owners, commuters, and drivers were purposively selected from communities within the vicinity of the dumpsite, while a key informant interview was conducted with an official of the Enugu State Waste Management Authority (ESWAMA). Data were analysed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed that air pollution arising from open waste burning constituted the most significant environmental concern. Respondents reported persistent smoke, odours, poor air quality, pests, and respiratory ailments. The dumpsite was also found to negatively affect local businesses through declining customer patronage and reduced sales. Residents further perceived a decline in neighbourhood attractiveness and property values, while drivers and commuters reported reduced visibility, road safety concerns, and travel discomfort. The study also found widespread dissatisfaction with waste management practices, citing irregular waste collection, inadequate environmental control measures, and limited community involvement in decision-making. The study concludes that the current management of the Enugu Urban municipal dumpsite poses significant environmental, health, and socio-economic challenges. It recommends improved waste management practices, elimination of open waste burning, enhanced community participation, and the adoption of sustainable waste treatment and disposal strategies.
John-Nsa et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: