This article demonstrates how anticipatory climate litigation allocates responsibility for future climate impacts on corporations.
Key Points
The aim is to explore how anticipatory climate litigation allocates future responsibility to corporations rather than seeking compensation for past damages.
Analyzed the landmark case Milieudefensie versus Royal Dutch Shell in the Netherlands.
Examined the role of climate science and broader knowledge bases in court arguments.
Discussed the implications of the court's rulings on corporate accountability and responsibilities.
Demonstrated that courts can clarify corporate responsibilities for greenhouse gas emissions.
Confirmed key legal principles despite the 2024 overturn of the initial decision.
Highlighted the effectiveness of using a broad array of knowledge to establish a 'global consensus' on climate dangers.