Abstract Through a critical reflection on Eric Voegelin’s narrative of the Chinese spiritual breakthrough, Chen Yun’s The Historical Philosophy of Civilization attempts to revise and reconstruct the “Image of China” in the Ecumenic Age . This reconstruction is defined by four comparative dimensions. First, the Sage (圣人), rather than the King (帝王), is identified as the true carrier of the Chinese spiritual Tianxia (All-under-Heaven). Second, relative to Greek Philosophy and Hebrew Revelation, Jing-Shi (Classics and History) is established as the unique symbolic form of the Chinese spiritual breakthrough. Third, Ren -consciousness – distinct from Greek Noetic and Hebrew Pneumatic consciousness – constitutes the specific human locus of this breakthrough. Finally, the Truth of Zhongdao (The Mean) serves as the existential truth of Chinese civilization, functioning as a regulative “Meta-Truth” for opening up the existential tension of humanity. By transforming Voegelin’s image of China, the book not only addresses the epochal question of “What Makes China” but also positions Confucian philosophy as a vital resource for “future thought”.
Jiang Qiuliu (Sat,) studied this question.