Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines judgment formulation in auditors, indicating significant decision variances.
This research study focuses upon the auditor's opinion formulation process. Using 60 auditors from national accounting firms, this study examined the effects of general practice priors, management integrity, and control consciousness on judgments of the likelihood of material error occurring in accounts receivable. The results of analysis of covariance suggest large decision variances across auditors, a high degree of significance attached to general practice priors, and significant control consciousness for audit seniors' preliminary evaluations of internal accounting control effectiveness. Management integrity was not significant. The implications of these results for practice and further research are summarized and discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaplan et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: