Evaluation of peer review files reveals insights into self-regulation in the SECPS, suggesting important policy considerations.
Describes public peer review files on members of the United States Securities and Exchange Practice Section (SECPS) from 1980 through the first quarter of 1986. Codification of findings, report types and attributes of reviewee and reviewer; Insights into how the process is working; Evaluation of criticisms of self-regulation; Attention toward policy issues and other questions meriting inquiry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wanda A. Wallace (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: