Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates mutation testing in large language models, suggesting enhanced benchmarking techniques.
Most traditional benchmarks for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in software development suffer from a narrow focus, high risks of data contamination, and static difficulty levels that fail to keep pace with rapid model evolution. To address these limitations, we introduce CDBench, a novel zero-sum benchmark based on the Code Defenders mutation testing game. By pitting models against each other in a competitive environment—where “attackers” introduce code mutations and “defenders” create tests to detect them—CDBench establishes a dynamic difficulty curve that scales naturally without human intervention. Our experiments reveal that while LLMs can generate diverse mutations, they often struggle with code validity; nevertheless, the framework effectively distinguishes model capabilities, highlighting the superior test generation of models like Gemini 2.5 Pro while exposing the instruction-following limitations of reasoning models. These findings demonstrate that zero-sum games offer a viable, contamination-resistant solution to the stagnation of current evaluation methodologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romazanov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: