PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2000Journal of Bioresource Management533 citationsOpen Access

Blunt Splenic Injury in Adults: Multi-institutional Study of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

View Full Paper
APAndrew B. PeitzmanBHBrian HeilLRLouis Rivera

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management of blunt injury to the spleen in adults has been applied with increasing frequency. However, the criteria for nonoperative management are controversial. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to determine which factors predict successful observation of blunt splenic injury in adults. METHODS: A total of 1,488 adults (>15 years of age) with blunt splenic injury from 27 trauma centers in 1997 were studied through the Multi-institutional Trials Committee of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance and extended chi2 test. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD; a value of p 15 were successfully observed. Frequency of immediate operation correlated with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades of splenic injury: I (23.9%), II (22.4%), III (38.1%), IV (73.7%), and V (94.9%) (p < 0.05). Of patients initially managed nonoperatively, the failure rate increased significantly by AAST grade of splenic injury: I (4.8%), II (9.5%), III (19.6%), IV (33.3%), and V (75.0%) (p < 0.05). A total of 60.9% of the patients failed nonoperative management within 24 hours of admission; 8% failed 9 days or later after injury. Laparotomy was ultimately performed in 19.9% of patients with small hemoperitoneum, 49.4% of patients with moderate hemoperitoneum, and 72.6% of patients with large hemoperitoneum. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter study, 38.5% of adults with blunt splenic injury went directly to laparotomy. Ultimately, 54.8% of patients were successfully managed nonoperatively; the failure rate of planned observation was 10.8%, with 60.9% of failures occurring in the first 24 hours. Successful nonoperative management was associated with higher blood pressure and hematocrit, and less severe injury based on ISS, Glasgow Coma Scale, grade of splenic injury, and quantity of hemoperitoneum.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peitzman et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2fd370237323aabfb2a559https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200008000-00002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Management of blunt splenic trauma: Significant differences between adults and children1997 · 116 citations
  2. 2Optimizing the management of blunt splenic injury in adults and children1999 · 70 citations
  3. 3Organ Injury Scaling1995 · 1,152 citations
  4. 4Management and outcome of splenic injury: the results of a five-year statewide population-based study.1996 · 38 citations
  5. 5NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF BLUNT HEPATIC INJURIES1994 · 120 citations