Key result
Wearable ultra-low-power ultrasound probe tracks heart and respiration rates with ~5% error versus standard methods.
Why the study?
Existing ultrasound solutions typically do not provide concurrent heart rate and respiration rate detection or lack wearable form factors and low power budgets.
Does a chest-worn wearable ultra low power ultrasound probe accurately measure heart and respiration rates compared to standard methods?
Does a chest-worn wearable ultra low power ultrasound probe accurately measure heart and respiration rates compared to standard methods?
A novel wearable ultra-low power ultrasound probe can accurately and concurrently monitor heart and respiration rates with minimal power consumption.
May enable continuous low-power monitoring; leaves open prospective clinical validation before adoption.
The continuous monitoring of heart (HR) and respiration (RR) rates is crucial for long-term health assessment and physical activity tracking. HR can be extracted reliably by wearable sensors based on electrocardiography (ECG) and featuring multi-electrode setups. In turn, photoplethysmography (PPG) offers similar HR detection accuracy levels with minimal setups but is affected by motion artifacts. Furthermore, while PPG and ECG may also be utilized for indirect RR assessment, they typically result in moderate accuracy. In this context, ultrasound (US) is a valid tool for complete cardiorespiratory monitoring with a single sensor. In fact, instead of probing electro-optical signals near the skin’s surface, its penetrating ability allows accurate tracking of both ventilation and heartbeat frequencies. However, existing solutions based on the US do not typically offer concurrent HR and RR detection or are not available in wearable form factors and power budgets. In this paper, we demonstrate full cardiorespiratory assessment (HR and RR measurements) by means of a single chest-worn wearable ultra low power (ULP) US probe. The proposed methodology, based on the frequency analysis of sequences of A-mode scans, enables a reliable HR and RR assessment with less than 3.9% and 4.6% errors when compared to ECG (for HR measurements) and manual counting (for RR measurements), respectively. The proposed approach does not require precise positioning of the probe on the chest, offering robustness with respect to user misplacements of the sensor. The system consumes only 17 mW, thereby enabling long-term monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vostrikov et al. (2023) studied Cardiorespiratory monitoring. Wearable ultra low power (ULP) ultrasound (US) probe vs. ECG and manual counting was evaluated on Heart rate (HR) and respiration rate (RR) measurement errors. A single chest-worn wearable ultra low power ultrasound probe enabled reliable heart rate and respiration rate assessment with less than 3.9% and 4.6% errors compared to ECG and manual counting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: