We inverted teleseismic data for the 1965 Seattle‐Tacoma earthquake slip and rake. The earthquake had 2 asperities of 12 and 16 km 2 near the hypocenter with average slip of 2 and 2.8 m respectively (M o = 9.4 × 10 25 dyne‐cm; M w = 6.6). We also inverted strong‐motion and teleseismic data for the 2001 Nisqually earthquake. This earthquake had 2 subevents with an asperity area of 45 km 2 between 59 and 62 km depth with an average slip of 1.7 m (M o = 1.7 × 10 26 dyne‐cm; M w = 6.8). Shake‐maps of peak ground acceleration (PGA) and spectral acceleration (S a ) were generated using a time‐domain approach including slip model, site, and basin‐depth corrections based on California geology. Corrections reduced the residuals between observed and predicted PGA and S a . The simulated pattern of shaking from the 1965 earthquake was twice as high as in the 2001 earthquake due to the proximity of the 1965 epicenter to sedimentary basins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ichinose et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: