Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Extra-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinomas are rare, and when studied, frequently have been grouped with jejunoileal adenocarcinomas. Nevertheless, anecdotal experiences suggest that these neoplasms may present 2 or more distinct phenotypes. To better characterize these neoplasms, we performed a retrospective review of 38 cases with a special focus on the morphologic and immunophenotypic characteristics and their clinicopathologic significance. Our cohort of extra-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinomas was classified on the basis of the morphologic features into gastric type (n=19, 50%), intestinal type (n=14, 37%), pancreaticobiliary type (n=2, 5%), and others (n=3, 8%). Most gastric-type adenocarcinomas (n=18, 95%) developed in the proximal duodenum, whereas the other types were located equally in the proximal and distal duodenum. Intestinal-type dysplasia was present at the periphery of 8 (57%) intestinal-type adenocarcinomas, and 8 (42%) gastric-type adenocarcinoma were associated with gastric-type dysplasia. Gastric foveolar metaplasia (n=12) and Brunner gland hyperplasia (n=10) were exclusively recognized adjacent to gastric-type adenocarcinomas. Notably, intestinal-type histology and the absence of lymph node metastasis were significantly associated with favorable disease-free survival in univariate and multivariate analyses. In summary, this study demonstrated that 2 major subsets of extra-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma, intestinal type and gastric type, are associated with distinct histopathologic features and clinical behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ushiku et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: