PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2006Limnology and Oceanography151 citationsOpen Access

Cultural eutrophication in the Choptank and Patuxent estuaries of Chesapeake Bay

View Full Paper
TFTom FisherJHJD HagyWBWalter R. Boynton

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The Choptank and Patuxent tributaries of Chesapeake Bay have become eutrophic over the last 50–100 years. Systematic monitoring of nutrient inputs began in ~1970, and there have been 2–5‐fold increases in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) inputs during 1970–2004 due to sewage discharges, fertilizer applications, atmospheric deposition, and changes in land use. Hydrochemical modeling and land‐use yield coefficients suggest that current input rates are 4–20 times higher for N and P than under forested conditions existing 350 yr ago. Sewage is a major cause of increased nutrients in the Patuxent; agricultural inputs dominate in the Choptank. These loading increases have caused three major water‐quality problems: (1) increased nutrients, phytoplankton, and turbidity; (2) decreased submerged grasses due to higher turbidity and epiphyton shading; and (3) bottom‐water hypoxia due to respiration of excess organic matter. Oxygen in the Patuxent is consistently <3 mg L −1 in bottom waters in summer, whereas oxygen in Choptank bottom waters has been decreasing for the last 20 yr and is now approaching 3 mg L −1 in wet years. The low N: P of sewage inputs to the Patuxent results in an N‐limited, P‐saturated system, whereas the Choptank is primarily limited by N, but with P limitation of phytoplankton during spring river flows. Insufficient action has been taken to improve the water and habitat quality of these estuaries, although reduced eutrophication in dry years suggests that both estuaries will respond to significant decreases in nutrients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fisher et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a31681e616780d60c579b46https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0435
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Estimation of Net Physical Transport and Hydraulic Residence Times for a Coastal Plain Estuary Using Box Models2000 · 115 citations
  2. 2Rainfall stimulation of primary production in western Atlantic Ocean waters:roles of different nitrogen sources and co-limiting nutrients1999 · 92 citations
  3. 3Wind‐forced salt intrusion into a tributary estuary1990 · 35 citations
  4. 4Historical Land-cover Conversion (1665?1820) in the Choptank Watershed, Eastern United States2004 · 41 citations
  5. 5AN EXAMINATION OF LAND USE ‐ NUTRIENT EXPORT RELATIONSHIPS 11982 · 409 citations