Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to update the Healthy Eating Index-C (HEI-C) with Canada's new food guide recommendations (HEIC-2009) and compare scores and ratings among a small sample of grade 6 students. DESIGN: Updates to the HEI-C were completed with Canada's new food guide recommendations for daily number of servings. HEI-C and HEIC-2009 scores were computed for a small sample (n 405) of grade 6 students utilizing nutrition data that were collected using the Food Behaviour Questionnaire, a validated web-based dietary assessment tool (including a 24 h dietary recall, FFQ, and food and physical activity behavioural questions). SETTING: Data were collected in fifteen schools in the Region of Waterloo District School Board, Ontario, Canada. SUBJECTS: A total of 405 students (48 % males and 52 % females) from grade 6 classrooms completed the web-based survey. RESULTS: The index scores revealed that participants scored higher (74.5 v. 69.6, P < 0.001) using the HEIC-2009 compared with the HEI-C, even though both index scores are rated in the 'needs improvement' category (HEIC-2009, 75 %; HEI-C, 71 %). A small group of participants (n 14), who were previously rated (using the HEI-C) in the 'poor' category, were rated in the 'needs improvement' category using the HEIC-2009 (chi2 = 589.647, df = 4, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The HEIC-2009 has the potential to be used as a population-level diet quality index in Canada.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woodruff et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: