Key result
Non-contact and video-based computer vision technologies provide an alternative to contact sensors for monitoring physiological parameters during physical exercise.
Why the study?
Contact sensor technology for physiological parameter monitoring has limitations, prompting the need to review emerging inexpensive, accurate non-contact and video-based technologies used during exercise.
Non-contact and video-based technologies provide emerging methods for monitoring vital signs like heart rate and blood pressure during physical exercise.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform activity monitoring in rehabilitation settings; leaves open optimal algorithms for age- and disease-specific use.
Physical activity is movement of the body or part of the body to make muscles more active and to lose the energy from the body. Regular physical activity in the daily routine is very important to maintain good physical and mental health. It can be performed at home, a rehabilitation center, gym, etc., with a regular monitoring system. How long and which physical activity is essential for specific people is very important to know because it depends on age, sex, time, people that have specific diseases, etc. Therefore, it is essential to monitor physical activity either at a physical activity center or even at home. Physiological parameter monitoring using contact sensor technology has been practiced for a long time, however, it has a lot of limitations. In the last decades, a lot of inexpensive and accurate non-contact sensors became available on the market that can be used for vital sign monitoring. In this study, the existing research studies related to the non-contact and video-based technologies for various physiological parameters during exercise are reviewed. It covers mainly Heart Rate, Respiratory Rate, Heart Rate Variability, Blood Pressure, etc., using various technologies including PPG, Video analysis using deep learning, etc. This article covers all the technologies using non-contact methods to detect any of the physiological parameters and discusses how technology has been extended over the years. The paper presents some introductory parts of the corresponding topic and state of art review in that area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khanal et al. (2022) conducted a review in Physical exercise monitoring. Non-contact and video-based technologies vs. Contact sensor technology was evaluated on Physiological parameters (Heart Rate, Respiratory Rate, Heart Rate Variability, Blood Pressure). Non-contact and video-based computer vision technologies provide an alternative to contact sensors for monitoring physiological parameters during physical exercise.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: