Background As the frequency of metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales is increasing worldwide, effective antimicrobials to treat the infections caused by these organisms are urgently needed. Methods The activity of aztreonam-avibactam and comparators were evaluated against 27 834 Enterobacterales isolates collected from 74 US medical centers in 2019–2021. Isolates were susceptibility tested by broth microdilution. An aztreonam-avibactam pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoint of ≤8 mg/L was applied for comparison. Antimicrobial susceptibility and the frequency of key resistance phenotypes were assessed then stratified by year and infection type. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) were screened for carbapenemase (CPE) genes by whole genome sequencing. Results Aztreonam-avibactam inhibited >99.9% of Enterobacterales at ≤8 mg/L. Only 3 isolates (0.01%) had an aztreonam-avibactam minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >8 mg/L. The CRE rates were 0.8%, 0.9%, and 1.1% in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively; 99.6% (260 of 261) of CRE isolates were inhibited at an aztreonam-avibactam MIC of ≤8 mg/L. The CRE susceptibility to meropenem-vaborbactam decreased from 91.7% in 2019 to 83.1% in 2020 and 76.5% in 2021 (82.1% overall). The CRE, multidrug-resistant, and extensively drug-resistant phenotypes were markedly higher among isolates from pneumonia compared with other infections. The most common carbapenemase among CRE was Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (65.5% of CRE), followed by New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (11.1%), oxacillinase (OXA)-48-like (4.6%), Serratia marcescens enzyme (2.3%), and imipenemase (1.5%). Among non-CPE-producing CRE isolates (n = 44; 16.9% of CRE), 97.7% were inhibited at ≤8 mg/L aztreonam-avibactam and 85.4% were meropenem-vaborbactam susceptible. Conclusions The frequencies of MBL and OXA-48-type producers increased markedly. Aztreonam-avibactam demonstrated potent and consistent activity against Enterobacterales across infection types and over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sader et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: