Why the study?
Does anticoagulation improve outcomes or reduce thrombotic risk in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis?
Does anticoagulation improve outcomes or reduce thrombotic risk in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis?
This review highlights the prothrombotic state in IPF and suggests that new oral anticoagulants may offer advantages in targeting both thrombotic risk and fibrosis progression despite conflicting prior trial results.
Anticoagulation in IPF warrants clinical caution; leaves open targeted NOAC trials for thrombotic and fibrotic effects.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an incurable, progressive interstitial lung disease with a prognosis that is worse than that of many cancers. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a link between IPF and thrombotic vascular events. Coagulation and fibrinolytic systems play central roles in wound healing and repair, processes hypothesised to be abnormal within the IPF lung. Animal models of pulmonary fibrosis have demonstrated an imbalance between thrombosis and fibrinolysis within the alveolar compartment, a finding that is also observed in IPF patients. A systemic prothrombotic state also occurs in IPF and is associated with increased mortality, but trials of anticoagulation in IPF have provided conflicting results. Differences in methodology, intervention and study populations may contribute to the inconsistent trial outcomes. The new oral anticoagulants have properties that may prove advantageous in targeting both thrombotic risk and progression of lung fibrosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crooks et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: