This research investigates biomass burning aerosols' climatic effects, indicating substantial global influences.
Aerosols emitted by biomass burning represent one of the largest sources of uncertainty in our current understanding of the Earth’s radiative balance. We investigate the climatic influence of biomass burning aerosols emitted from six key regions of biomass burning by using GEOS-Chem coupled with the rapid radiative transfer model. We evaluate our model using AERONET observation, with the model reproducing data with 87% observed spatial and seasonal variability with a low negative bias of 7%. The radiation sensitivity is generally highest for North Asia (NAS) and for North America (NCC); lowest for South America (SAM) and South and Southeast Asia (SSA); and moderate for Africa (AFR) and Oceania (OCE). These regional differences are related to the main burning types of the regions. When we consider the global radiation influence, AFR dominates the global picture due to the comparatively large biomass burned. We estimate the global mean radiation influence of biomass burning aerosol is −0.116 W m−2. For monthly features, in summer, due to higher incident energy obtained in NAS and NCC, high negative radiation sensitivity of biomass burning, biomass burning aerosols, and biomass burning organic aerosol are shown in these regions. Meanwhile, the radiation sensitivity peak of black carbon for these two regions occurs earlier in late spring (NAS) or early summer (NCC), when large incident energy and large high reflectance snow cover coexist in these two high-latitude regions. A significant yearly difference in radiation influence, rather than radiation sensitivity, is found, with the relative difference between the maximum year and minimum year reaching 90% of the maximum radiation influence year. Specifically, two regions affected by El Niño (OCE and SSA) have the most significant yearly variation in all factors, with anomalies occurring in El Niño years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: