Compares vascular impacts of bisphenols F and S, suggesting health risks for maternal-fetal systems.
In recent years, bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS) have been used in several everyday products to replace bisphenol A (BPA), since exposure to BPA has been associated with the development of several pathologies. However, recent studies have also been associating exposure to BPA substitutes with the development of various pathologies, including cardiovascular diseases, and the safety of BPA substitutes for human health has been questioned. Thus, this study aimed to investigate and compare BPA, BPF and BPS effects on arterial tone and to explore the mechanisms involved. The results suggest that BPA, BPS and BPF exert non-genomic and endothelium-independent relaxant effects on arteries and smooth muscle cells from the umbilical cord. Regarding genomic effects, the results suggest that BPA, BPF, and BPS disrupted the primary mechanisms underlying HUA relaxation by interfering with the cGMP signaling pathway and modulating the Ca2+ channels activity. Moreover, these results suggest that BPF alters the vasorelaxant response more than BPA and BPS. Therefore, replacing BPA with its substitutes does not appear to be beneficial for human cardiovascular health. Thus, in the future, the vascular effects of these bisphenols should be further evaluated to clarify their modes of action and future implications for maternal-fetal health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abrantes-Soares et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: