Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium phenylbutyrate–taurursodiol (PB–TURSO) and its components in slowing disease progression and improving survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing PB–TURSO or its components to placebo or standard of care in adults with ALS were included. The primary outcomes were functional decline (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale–Revised [ALSFRS-R]) and survival. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis, and a narrative synthesis was conducted for Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid (TUDCA) monotherapy and secondary analyses from the CENTAUR trial. Results: Two RCTs (n = 801) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in either ALSFRS-R decline (mean difference [MD] 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.01 to 4.02; P = 0.24; I² =71%) or survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 95% CI 0.73–1.11; P = 0.31; I² = 61%). A separate trial of TUDCA monotherapy ( n = 34) demonstrated significant functional benefits. Post hoc analyses of the CENTAUR trial reported a survival benefit of 6.5–10.6 months and delayed progression to major disease milestones. Biomarker analyses suggested anti-inflammatory effects. The risk of bias was moderate to high, and the certainty of evidence was rated very low by GRADE. Conclusions: Based on very low certainty evidence, the available RCT data do not support a definitive conclusion regarding the efficacy of PB–TURSO in ALS. Post hoc exploratory analyses suggest a potential survival benefit, which requires confirmation in adequately powered, prospectively designed trials; current results are hypothesis-generating rather than practice-defining.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jomaa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: