Qualitative case study explores how Anchor Institutions contribute to value creation amid disruption in urban environments, highlighting unique mechanisms.
This article investigates the role of an Anchor Institution (Anchor) within a place-based public service ecosystem (PSE) during disruption. Specifically, it examines how Anchors shape the conditions under which actors can participate in value creation. Drawing on a qualitative single-case study of the University of Siena, an Anchor embedded in a city-campus where students, services, and territorial actors are closely intertwined, we show how disruption activates the Anchor’s multi-level role unevenly. While some actors are enabled to participate and mobilize resources for value creation, others are constrained from doing so. Crucially, we also theorize a new relational mechanism, which we term ‘reverse anchoring’. This mechanism captures how other PSE actors mobilize resources (e.g. venues) to support the restoration of the Anchor’s multi-level role. In doing so, the article offers a novel account of PSE robustness, showing that it also arises from the involvement of peripheral PSE actors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pica et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: