Descriptive survey assesses students' digital literacy and skills, revealing gaps in advanced competencies.
Background: The rapid integration of digital technologies into higher education has heightened the demand for digitally literate graduates who possess 21st-century competencies. In Nigeria's Colleges of Education, particularly in the North-East geopolitical zone, evidence of students' digital literacy proficiency in innovation, creativity, and problem-solving remains largely empirically undocumented. Objectives: This study assessed the digital literacy of business education students' innovation, creativity, and problem-solving skills, and examined whether significant differences exist between the perceptions of students and lecturers. Methods: A descriptive survey research design was adopted. A total of 360 respondents (312 students and 48 lecturers) drawn from four Colleges of Education in North-East Nigeria were sampled using proportionate stratified random sampling. A validated 21-item questionnaire with a four-point Likert scale served as the data collection instrument. Mean, standard deviation, and independent samples t-test were used for data analysis. Results: Findings revealed that business education students possessed high levels of digital literacy in innovation skills (Grand x̄ = 2.71), creativity skills (Grand x̄ = 2.81), and problem-solving skills (Grand x̄ = 2.66). Independent samples t-test results showed no statistically significant differences between students' and lecturers' mean responses across all three dimensions (p > .05). Conclusions: Although digital literacy levels are appreciable, deficiencies persist in advanced competencies such as AI-assisted innovation, generative creativity tools, and decision-support systems. Curriculum reform, targeted digital infrastructure investment, and lecturer capacity development are recommended to bridge identified gaps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Odunola et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: