Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study compares oncological outcomes in HPV-positive and HPV-negative cervical cancer patients, indicating HPV negativity worsens prognosis.
To compare oncological outcomes between HPV-positive and HPV-negative cervical cancer patients in a large Chinese multicenter cohort. This retrospective study included cervical squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma. Propensity score matching (PSM, 2:1) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression were applied to compare 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The proportional hazards assumption was tested. Multicenter heterogeneity was adjusted using center stratification. Missing data were managed by complete-case analysis and multiple imputation sensitivity analysis. A total of 11,215 eligible patients were included. Before PSM, the HPV-positive group showed significantly better 5-year OS (92.3% vs. 84.3%, P < 0.001) and DFS (88.0% vs. 79.6%, P < 0.001) than the HPV-negative group. Multivariable Cox analysis confirmed HPV negativity as an independent risk factor for OS (HR = 1.545, 95%CI 1.091-2.188, P = 0.014) and DFS (HR = 1.556, 95%CI 1.212-1.997, P < 0.001). After 2:1PSM, HPV-positive patients still had superior 5-year OS (88.4% vs. 84.3%, P = 0.004) and DFS (85.3% vs. 79.6%, P < 0.001). Among 7,998 patients who underwent radical surgery, similar results were observed before and after PSM. HPV-negative status is associated with inferior 5-year OS and DFS and serves as an independent adverse prognostic factor in cervical cancer, including patients treated with radical surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: