Cross-sectional study examines the link between cervicogenic headache and lifestyle factors in Saudi college students, suggesting potential health impacts.
Background and Objectives: Cervicogenic headaches (CGH) are increasingly common among college students and may negatively affect academic performance and sleep quality. This study aimed to identify the self-reported prevalence of cervicogenic-type head and neck pain in a convenience sample of Saudi college students and to examine its associations with electronic device use, physical activity, and sleep quality among college students in Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 313 college students from various Saudi university colleges using an online self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire gathered information on sociodemographic characteristics, electronic device usage, neck pain awareness, physical activity levels, and sleep quality. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, and chi-square tests were used to explore associations between potential predictors and the prevalence of self-reported cervicogenic-type head and neck pain consistent with possible CGH. Results: Most participants were female (84.3%) and aged 18–25 years (95.2%). Cervicogenic-type head and neck pain were reported by 65.2% (n = 204/313), while 56.5% experienced moderate to severe stress. A significant association was found with perceived stress (p = 0.002). Prolonged electronic device use (>4 h/day: 77.9%; p < 0.01), lower physical activity (p = 0.056), medication use (p < 0.01), headache exacerbation with inactivity (p = 0.006), and poor sleep quality (95.1% with PSQI > 10; p = 0.044) were significantly associated. Conclusions: These findings highlight associations between excessive electronic device use, low physical activity, and poor sleep quality with self-reported cervicogenic-type head and neck pain among Saudi college students. Future longitudinal studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to determine whether targeting these factors reduces the prevalence of CGH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohamed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: