Maps fault tolerance metrics in circulant interconnection networks, suggesting optimized designs enhance relay survivability.
Circulant interconnection networks provide symmetric addressing, compact generator descriptions, and uniform local connectivity. This paper maps a degree–redundancy landscape for a fault-tolerant two-hop primitive in directed circulants: given n nodes and degree budget m, how large can the worstcase shared-relay multiplicity R(n,m) be? A node is a shared relay for an ordered terminal pair if it has outgoing links to both terminals; an f-relay-fault-tolerant circulant requires at least f + 1 such relays for every pair. The underlying feasibility condition is a cyclic difference-multiplicity condition, which we use as a mathematical tool rather than claim as a new object. The contribution is the network-design framework around this tool: the parameters R(n,m) and Df (n), a negative theorem for interval circulants, relay-table preprocessing and lookup algorithms, adversarial and random failure guarantees, loadbalance scope, certified upper-bound interpretation of heuristic designs, exact small-n calibration, a software lookup-versussearch microbenchmark, and a reproducible study of 526,539 generator sets. The results show that generator choice critically determines worst-case relay survivability: optimized threshold designs achieve f-relay-fault tolerance within about 1.16–1.63 of the counting lower bound, while standard interval generators can fail structurally even at much larger degrees.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AlBader et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: