Investigates local repairs of resource placements in Eisenstein–Jacobi networks, suggesting effective strategies for resource failures.
Perfect resource placements in dense Eisenstein–Jacobi networks partition the network into hexagonal radius-t service cells. Thefault-free placement problem is already classified; this paper studies the complementary post-deployment problem of locally repairing such placements after resource failures. For the dense Eisenstein–Jacobi family generated by α = n + (n − 1)ω, with t = n − 1, we first prove failure-cell locality and candidate locality. For one failed resource, we prove that one nonfailed replacement cannot cover the failed hexagon and that two replacements always suffice; hence ρEJ(t) = 2 for every t ≥ 1. Among all minimum-size one-fault repairs, we prove the sharp minimum-overlap formula ΩEJ(t) = t2. The lower bound follows from the three-strip geometry of Eisenstein–Jacobi balls: every two-ball cover of a failed hexagonal cell contains a forced t × t axial interface region. We then extend the framework beyond one fault. For two failed resources, independent repair gives a universal four-replacement upper bound, but unlike the Gaussian case the EJ geometry is not always additive: we give explicit three-replacement constructions for two infinite neighboring displacement families and prove algebraic three-strip constructions for the infinite non-additive neighboring families. For additive neighboring pairs, we prove two algebraic lower-bound mechanisms: an endpoint-rigidity theorem for pairs with separated opposite axial endpoints, and a diagonal-corridor theorem for the remaining family D = ±(g1 + g2). Thus the closed-form two-fault section separates the non-additive neighboring families from the additive mechanisms without leaving the diagonal corridor as an open case. For q failed resources, independent canonical repair gives a universal 2q upper bound, and this bound is exact whenever failed cells are separated by more than 4t in Eisenstein–Jacobi distance. We also identify and prove infinite dense four-fault and six-fault cluster families: the four-fault cluster has exact repair number four rather than eight, and the six-fault cluster has exact repair number five rather than twelve, showing strong multi-fault subadditivity. For arbitrary multi-fault repairs, we prove an exact inclusion–exclusion identity for repeated coverage inside the failed region and its low-multiplicity specializations. A second exact optimization audit over 19,400 multi-fault instances for 2 ≤ t ≤ 12 and 3 ≤ q ≤ 6 confirms widespread subadditivity, including q = 6 instances with saving seven relative to independent repair. The results show that Eisenstein–Jacobi local repair is not a direct copy of the Gaussian case: the one-fault overlap is quadratic, neighboring two-fault repair can drop from four to three, and dense clustered repairs can reuse replacement balls across several failed hexagonal cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bader AlBader (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: