The paper discusses the limitations of Kasei-Theory in establishing a final reason or justification.
This paper fixes why within Kasei-Theory as a non-modal fixation in which reason-demand is not established as reason. The paper does not answer why. It does not provide reason, ground, cause, origin, explanation, justification, sufficient reason, first cause, or foundation. It does not stop regress by giving a final reason. Why is fixed only as a structural position in which the demand for reason is not established as reason. Why is not inquiry, question, problem, search, answerability, psychological demand, subjective demand, cognitive demand, or the continuation of inquiry. Beginning does not answer why. Fuka does not answer why. Kagen does not answer why. Askability does not answer why. Kasei-Theory does not establish a final ground in response to why. No causality is introduced. No temporality is introduced. No subject is introduced. No relation is introduced. No origin is introduced. No explanation is introduced. No justification is introduced. No regress is introduced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juza Minamikata (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: