PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 17, 2026Open Access

Randomized Controlled Study of IASTM vs. SHAM Treatment in Alleviating Symptoms Associated with Upper Trapezius Myofascial Trigger Points

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

LFLyndsey Marie Fanlo FalameJBJustine Joy Yurag Borres

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Randomized trial compares IASTM and sham treatment effects on neck pain in office workers, suggesting IASTM is more effective.

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) to sham treatment in alleviating symptoms of myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius.
  • Single-blinded randomized controlled study among 20 office workers with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points
  • Participants randomly assigned to IASTM or sham treatment groups
  • Pain intensity and neck disability measured using VAS and NDI before and after interventions.
  • IASTM group showed a greater reduction in NDI from 11.80 to 0.60 versus sham from 11.40 to 7.80 (p<0.001)
  • VAS in IASTM group decreased from 5.40 to 0.80 compared to sham from 5.20 to 3.10 (p<0.001)
  • Post-treatment comparisons revealed significantly greater improvements in both neck disability and pain intensity in the IASTM group (p<0.001).

Cite This Study

Falame et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a323a2ad50b63ecad2055c2https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20685111
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share