Finds connections between deep-MOND and Newton-Hooke contraction in cosmology, suggesting new interpretations.
Milgrom's deep-MOND limit is the scaling limit G → 0, a0 → infinity with G·a0 fixed, while the de Sitter-to-Newton–Hooke contraction is c → infinity at fixed Hubble time. We point out that, if the empirical relation a0 = kappa·c·H is promoted to a structural identification and G·a0 is held fixed, the two limits become a single scaling problem. This does not derive MOND from de Sitter space; rather, it organizes the deep-MOND sector. Within the AQUAL family K ~ |grad phi|^(2p), p > 1/2, the contraction selects p = 3/2 as the unique finite nontrivial exponent: smaller-p terms vanish and larger-p terms diverge. We also show that the contraction does not transport the de Sitter so(4,1) isometry algebra: the rescaled boosts become an abelian ideal. The relevant so(4,1) symmetry is instead the standard boundary action on conf(E3), matching the conformal invariance of the three-dimensional p-Laplacian at p = 3. Expanding around a uniform-gradient background gives a static stiffness anisotropy 2p-1 = 1/gamma, the same combination that fixes the force law. Phenomenological consequences are stated as falsifiable tests: the primary de Sitter-invariant reading predicts constant a0, while a phenomenological a0 ~ H(z) running gives a distinct high-redshift Tully–Fisher/RAR evolution. All symbolic and numerical verifications are reproducible from the accompanying repository.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. Nunno (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: