Demonstrates improved accuracy in open-set classification using novel multimodal fusion techniques, enhancing detection of unknown classes.
Open-set classification for remote sensing requires models that simultaneously achieve high accuracy on known land-cover types and reliably detect novel classes absent from the training distribution—a capability essential for real-world deployment where new classes routinely emerge. Existing multimodal fusion approaches for hyperspectral imagery (HSI) and LiDAR are primarily designed for closed-set scenarios and lack robust uncertainty modeling for unknown detection. We propose a post hoc calibrated multimodal open-set framework with three tightly integrated components. First, an Uncertainty-Aware Gating Fusion (UAGF) module dynamically weights HSI and LiDAR features per sample based on modality reliability and produces a gating uncertainty signal reflecting fusion confidence. Second, an Iterative Feedback Refinement (IFR) module progressively refines fused representations over multiple iterations and captures convergence dynamics, where stable convergence indicates known samples while high feature-change variance identifies potential unknowns. Third, a compact two-signal open-set detector combines gating uncertainty and refinement variance through an EVT (Weibull)-based post hoc calibration mechanism fitted exclusively on known validation samples. The framework follows a strict zero-unknown-supervision protocol: the multimodal backbone is trained using only known-class samples, and the open-set decision threshold is derived solely from the known validation score distribution. This design decouples representation of learning from open-set decision learning, improving robustness and avoiding the objective conflicts that arise in joint training. Comprehensive experiments on three benchmark datasets—Houston2013, Muufl, and Augsburg—demonstrate that the proposed method achieves 92.79%, 84.47%, and 80.99% overall accuracy and 76.48%, 63.91%, and 56.81% unknown accuracy, outperforming the closest multimodal competitor HyLiOSR by up to 32.4 pp in unknown accuracy while maintaining competitive closed-set performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Myagmarsuren et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: