Axiomatic formulation defines statistical learning gaps and free energy dynamics, implying structural insights.
Established results of statistical learning theory are systematised here in axiomatic form. No technical originality is claimed: the central statements reformulate known theorems. The contribution, if any, is structural: the problem is defined as the quadruple (D, F, l, A), whose three non-trivial arrows open three gaps -expressivity, induction, search- of which the central statements are a direct reading and through which the excess risk factorises. The mutual irreducibility of the gaps is proved and the relativity of their exhaustiveness is declared: the triad is canonical with respect to the adopted definition, not absolute -a weak chart, not a privileged coordinate system-. The synthesis object I = eval o A is made precise as a morphism in a Markov category. The triad is finally condensed into a single functional -the free energy F_beta-, whose minimum is the Gibbs posterior, whose gradient flow is the search dynamics, and whose bound certifies generalisation; the consistency of that form requires the fluctuation-dissipation relation and turns into a corollary, within the variational condensation adopted, the postulate of randomness. This deposit includes the English and Spanish editions
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
HORACIO BRIZUELA (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: