Bibliometric audit reveals economic focus in sustainable routing, indicating a social sustainability gap.
Background: The Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) is foundational to logistics optimization, yet its alignment with the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) and UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) remains fragmented. This study conducts a strategic bibliometric audit of 301 peer–reviewed publications (1992–2025) to quantify the evolutionary progression and thematic maturity of sustainable routing research. Methods: A four–stage scientometric framework was employed, utilizing Scopus–based data retrieval, longitudinal mapping, and Python 3.14–driven text mining to visualize keyword co–occurrence networks, author collaborations, and regional research clusters. Results: Findings reveal a pronounced “Sustainability Asymmetry,” where 51.5% of studies prioritize economic efficiency, while only 2.6% address the social pillar. Additionally, social sustainability remains an “isolated island” with minimal cross–citation to the research core. Geographic analysis identifies a heavy concentration in China, the USA, and Western Europe, uncovering a critical North–South—collaboration gap. Conclusions: The study proves that while environmental themes reached maturity between 2018 and 2022, social indicators exhibit a significant maturity lag. This quantified social deficit, centered on the neglect of SDG 3 and SDG 10, mandates a fundamental paradigm shift toward a geographically inclusive and socially conscious research agenda to ensure global logistical equity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belmabrouk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: