Evaluates inhalable drug formulation production methods, highlighting sustainability and cost trade-offs.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Pharmaceutical manufacturing must balance therapeutic efficacy with environmental and economic sustainability. Inhalable dry powder formulations are effective for treating respiratory infections, yet the sustainability of production methods remains poorly understood. This study evaluates three scalable microparticle fabrication techniques, spray drying (SD), spray freeze-drying (SFD), and supercritical CO 2 antisolvent crystallization (SAS), for producing dual-drug inhalable formulations combining molnupiravir and tobramycin. In the machine learning section, random forest (RF) was used to investigate the impact of each condition in different methods on the drug particle size. Particle morphology and stability varied by method, with SFD producing highly porous particles and optimal aerosol performance. However, a gate-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) highlight trade-offs: SFD incurred higher burdens than SD across all nine environmental impact categories, while SD achieved the lowest overall environmental burden and the lowest cost (USD $0.4218 one batch). Sensitivity analysis shows that shifting to clean energy sources could reduce emissions by up to 52%. Through machine learning, LCA, and LCC, this work establishes a predictive framework for sustainability-oriented pharmaceutical manufacturing, advancing both granulation-stage eco-conscious drug production and strategies for reducing the footprint of emerging therapeutic technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: