Qualitative study reveals systemic failure in the Thai cocoa value chain, suggesting key constraints for innovation.
Systemic failure theory explains why innovation systems underperform, yet knowledge, network, institutional and infrastructure failures are often treated as separable constraints. This research develops a recursive account of systemic failure in emerging agricultural innovation systems, showing how failures become mutually reinforcing across value-chain nodes when intermediary architecture is thin. Drawing on thirty semi-structured interviews with growers, processors and distributors across eleven community enterprises in Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai and a two-stage yield-gap benchmark, the study examines the Thai cocoa value chain through an integrated systemic failure and innovation-functions framework. The findings show that yield and quality shortfalls are empirical traces of blocked innovation functions. Weak agronomic and post-harvest knowledge diffusion, thin grower-processor learning relationships, inaccessible certification and traceability pathways and sub-scale fermentation and drying infrastructure interact to reproduce underperformance. These interactions move downstream through heterogeneous supply and co-fermentation, and upstream through undifferentiated commodity prices that dampen upgrading incentives. The research contributes to innovation systems theory by conceptualising recursive failure as a value-chain mechanism through which structural failures suppress innovation functions over time, while explaining why local craft cocoa experimentation in Northern Thailand has not yet generated system-wide upgrading in the Thai cocoa value chain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sonthako et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: