Demonstrates accurate classification of pumpkin seed varieties, highlighting interpretability in model predictions.
Accurate automatic classification of seed varieties is important for seed sorting, quality assurance, and plant breeding, yet reliable discrimination remains difficult when cultivars exhibit highly similar visual characteristics. This study presents a reproducible and interpretable framework for the binary classification of two Turkish pumpkin seed varieties using tabular morphological descriptors extracted from segmented seed images. Unlike many previous machine learning studies in this domain, which offer limited interpretability and leave model decisions largely as a black box, the proposed approach places Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) at the center of the analysis. The framework combines biologically meaningful feature engineering, Optuna-based hyperparameter optimization, repeated stratified cross-validation, and a comparative evaluation of XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost. Model explainability was investigated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to identify the morphological traits driving both global and instance-level predictions, while corrected repeated k-fold t-tests were used to assess the statistical significance of performance differences, which confirmed comparable accuracy among the three boosting models and a significant advantage over the baseline classifiers. All three boosting ensembles consistently outperformed the baseline classifiers (SVM, Logistic Regression, and Random Forest) on the hold-out test set. CatBoost achieved the best overall results, with an accuracy of 0.888, an F1-score of 0.879, and an MCC of 0.777. SHAP analysis consistently highlighted compactness, roundness, eccentricity, and engineered interaction descriptors as the most influential predictors. Overall, the proposed XAI-driven framework provides an accurate and transparent solution for pumpkin seed classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabzi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: