Review explores hybrid quantum-classical models for COVID-19 medical imaging, suggesting key improvements needed.
This paper reviews hybrid quantum–classical (HQC) architectures for COVID-19-related respiratory medical-image analysis. To address the heterogeneity of existing studies, we propose an architecture-centric taxonomy based on the functional role and placement of the quantum module. Reviewed models are grouped into three archetypes: Archetype A, where quantum circuits act as patch-level quanvolutional preprocessors; Archetype B, where classical feature extractors are coupled with quantum classifier heads; and Archetype C, where quantum circuits generate intermediate features for downstream classical classifiers. Ten peer-reviewed journal studies were selected through a PRISMA-inspired search and analyzed across architecture, diagnostic performance, quantum resource reporting, validation rigor, computational scalability, and deployment feasibility. The review shows that HQC models often report promising binary COVID-19 screening results on CT or chest X-ray images, but multiclass respiratory classification remains less stable. Key limitations include simulator-dominated evaluation, limited external validation, unclear patient-wise splitting, incomplete reporting of qubit counts, circuit depth, and shots, and insufficient comparison with strong classical baselines. Overall, current HQC models should be viewed as exploratory quantum-augmented classical pipelines rather than clinically validated diagnostic systems. No conclusive task-level quantum advantage has yet been demonstrated for COVID-19 medical imaging. Future progress requires standardized benchmarking, transparent quantum-resource reporting, patient-wise and multi-center validation, hardware-aware evaluation, and interpretable hybrid designs compatible with NISQ-era constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salehi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: