PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 17, 2026Physics of Fluids0 citations

Time-evolving neural operator reconstruction and prediction of complex flows from sparse measurements

View Full Paper
ZZZiyun ZhangELEldin Wee Chuan Lim

Key Points

  • This work aims to improve the reconstruction and prediction of complex flow fields using a new neural operator framework.
  • Evaluated the time-evolving neural operator (TENO) framework for flow field reconstruction.
  • Assessed performance on benchmark problems, including single-phase flows and bubble column scenarios.
  • Compared TENO against dynamic mode decomposition and computational fluid dynamics for efficiency and accuracy.
  • TENO consistently outperformed dynamic mode decomposition in reconstruction and prediction accuracy.
  • Achieved relative errors on the order of 10−1 in a challenging three-dimensional bubble column benchmark.
  • Significantly reduced computational costs compared to high-fidelity CFD simulations while maintaining robustness under challenging conditions.

Abstract

Accurate reconstruction and prediction of complex flow fields from sparse measurements remain a critical challenge in chemical engineering, particularly for nonlinear and multiphase systems. Classical linear reduced-order models, such as dynamic mode decomposition (DMD), often fail to capture strongly unsteady and nonlinear flow dynamics, while high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are computationally prohibitive for real-time analysis and large-scale parametric studies. In this work, we evaluate a time-evolving neural operator (TENO) framework that learns the continuous spatiotemporal evolution of flow fields directly from practically limited and irregularly distributed observations. The performance of TENO is systematically evaluated on benchmark problems, from single-phase flows to an industrially relevant bubble column, where it consistently outperforms DMD in reconstruction and prediction accuracy. Compared with CFD simulations, TENO achieves relative errors on the order of 10−1 in a challenging three-dimensional bubble column benchmark, while significantly reducing computational cost and maintaining robustness under sparse/fixed-plane and noisy measurements.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a323c62d50b63ecad2068d3https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0328615
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper