Author responds to critiques on acetylcysteine dosing regimens for paracetamol poisoning, highlighting the need for standardization.
INTRODUCTION: I have reviewed Mullins et al's critique of my commentary "We need a standardized North American acetylcysteine dosing regimen for the treatment of paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning". DISCUSSION: I concur regarding this need, and I agree that the original three-bag regimen should be retired. However, we disagree upon its replacement. They challenge my recommendation for a two-bag regimen, and they favour the one-bag two-step approach. The impetus for a replacement acetylcysteine regimen is to decrease the adverse effects and errors associated with the three-bag protocol. However, the one-bag two-step regimen was not designed to decrease adverse effects, and their published reports do not find a decrease of errors. And a fatal adverse effect, acetylcysteine overdose, has emerged with use experience of this regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The one-bag two-step regimen should be dismissed from the quest for a standardized North American acetylcysteine dosing regimen for the treatment of paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milton Tenenbein (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: