Randomized trial evaluates Acanthus ebracteatus extract effects on shrimp health, suggesting a natural alternative to antibiotics.
Intensive shrimp aquaculture has led to increased disease outbreaks and a greater reliance on antibiotics, driving the need for sustainable alternatives. This study examined the phytochemical profile, antioxidant activity, and effects of Acanthus ebracteatus (AC) aqueous extract as a natural feed additive on growth performance, and health in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Phytochemical analysis of AC aqueous extracts revealed high concentrations of phenolics (162.1 ± 11.78 mg GAE/g), flavonoids (75.8 ± 2.32 mg RE/g), tannins (38.4 ± 0.78 mg TAE/g), and verbascoside (0.48 ± 0.01% w/w). Strong antioxidant capacity was confirmed with DPPH IC50 of 42.6 ± 11.78 µg/mL, ABTS IC50 of 2.93 ± 0.02 mg/mL, and FRAP value of 1.41 ± 0.08 mmol FeSO4/g extract. A feeding trial was conducted over eight weeks using 300 shrimp randomly assigned to four treatments: control diet and diets supplemented with 1%, 2%, and 3% AC aqueous extract. AC 2% supplementation showed optimal results for growth performance, including improved final body weight, weight gain, and feed conversion ratio. AC 3% treatment maximally enhanced immune responses, significantly elevating catalase, lysozyme, total antioxidant capacity, and hemocyanin, and glutathione peroxidase activity showed a numerical increase in AC-supplemented groups, particularly at the 3% inclusion level, although the differences were not statistically significant. AC 2% supplementation also improved hepatopancreatic histology through oxidative stress modulation and enhanced lipid metabolism. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of AC aqueous extract by integrating phytochemical characterization, antioxidant profiling, and in vivo assessment of growth, immune response, and hepatopancreatic morphology in Pacific white shrimp.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prisingkorn et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: