Demonstrates hybrid risk assessment framework in offshore systems, suggesting improved decision-making under uncertainty.
Probabilistic risk assessment of complex offshore oil and gas systems is often challenged by scarce statistical data and multiple uncertainties. Traditional point-value probability and standard Bayesian networks cannot fully represent and propagate these uncertainties, which may mislead high-risk security decision-making. To address this issue, this paper proposes a new hybrid risk assessment framework that combines interval-valued T-spherical fuzzy sets (IVTSFS) with credal networks (CN). First, IVTSFS is used to quantify the subjective risk perception of multiple experts, effectively capturing hesitancy, fuzziness, and group disagreement. An improved probability mapping mechanism is introduced to align linguistic evaluations with objective failure frequency spaces, thereby avoiding systemic transformation biases. Subsequently, the interval conditional probability table is constructed using the imprecise leakage noise-OR model, which alleviates the problem of parameter dimension explosion in complex causal structure and explicitly retains the parameter uncertainty. The 2U algorithm is then applied to perform accurate interval inference in CN. The feasibility and comparative advantages of the method are illustrated in the actual case of the single-point mooring system. The results clearly output the upper and lower bounds of the system failure risk, and identify the key vulnerable nodes through diagnostic reasoning and sensitivity analysis. This study has theoretical contributions in fuzzy decision-making and uncertainty modeling. By unifying advanced fuzzy cognitive quantification and imprecise probability propagation, it provides a structured uncertainty representation tool for expert-informed risk screening under data scarcity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: