Assesses efficacy of theranostic-guided UV therapy in progressive keratoconus, indicating improved vision outcomes.
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of theranostic-guided corneal UV therapy in progressive keratoconus and the association between theranostic imaging biomarkers and 1-year outcomes. METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive patients (73 eyes; mean age 22 ± 6 years) with progressive keratoconus underwent epithelial removal followed by theranostic-guided corneal UV therapy using 0.22% riboflavin ophthalmic solution. Eyes received either 10- or 15-minute preset riboflavin application protocol, followed by UV irradiation at 10 mW/cm2 for 9 minutes. The device generated 2 intraoperative imaging biomarkers: the riboflavin score, estimating stromal riboflavin concentration, and the theranostic score, quantifying UV-A mediated photoactivation. These scores enabled real-time monitoring to guide effective completion of treatment. A multivariate linear regression model evaluated the relationship between theranostic imaging biomarkers, baseline patient characteristics, and 1-year Kmax change. RESULTS: Theranostic-guided treatment was effective and showed 94% concordance with the 1-year Kmax flattening. Eight eyes (11%) required an additional 15% UV energy (1.3 extra minute at 10 mW/cm2) to surpass the theranostic score threshold of 0.60. Mean Kmax decreased by -1.6 ± 1.6 D (P < 0.001), whereas uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity improved significantly (P < 0.001). The regression model explained a limited proportion of outcome variance (R2 = 0.239; P = 0.01) and indicated that the riboflavin score had a greater association with Kmax flattening compared with the other variables included in the model. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time monitoring of stromal riboflavin permeation and photoactivation enables precise, individualized treatment, enhancing the ability to halt keratoconus progression by tailoring therapeutic effect to each cornea's molecular response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fruschelli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: